Blog

Tesla Defect Lawyer Discusses Recent Fatality, Class Action Lawsuit

Early in the morning of Saturday, September 20, 2025, a fatal wrong-way crash occurred on Interstate 84 in the Columbia River Gorge. The collision resulted in the death of 40-year-old Jeff Flood, a prominent youth sports coach from Boring, Oregon.

According to the Oregon State Police, the collision happened around milepost 24 when 26-year-old Autumn Breeze Willis of Beaverton was driving a BMW X3 westbound in the eastbound lanes. She collided head-on with Flood, who was driving a Tesla Model Y. The impact caused Flood’s Tesla to catch fire and become completely engulfed in flames. Flood was pronounced dead at the scene, while Willis sustained serious injuries and was taken to the hospital.

 

Photo credit: Portland Tribune

The crash shut down I-84 for approximately five hours as authorities investigated. Members of the local community, particularly those involved in youth sports, mourned the loss of Flood, recalling his dedication and compassionate support for young athletes and their families. The investigation into the incident is ongoing, with assistance from the Multnomah County Sheriff’s Office, Corbett Fire, and other agencies.

This tragic incident not only underscores the importance of safe and alert driving, but also the dangers of Tesla electric cars and other electric vehicles that can catch fire more easily.

Tesla Wrongful Death Lawsuit? Call DeShaw Law: (503) 227 1233

Known Defects in Tesla Vehicles Lead to Legal Action

Numerous cases and inquiries have raised concerns over Tesla’s Autopilot, vehicle design, and reporting protocols. Ongoing litigation, as well as a federal investigation into autonomous driving technology, underscore concerns about vehicle safety. 

Several recent Tesla defect cases have resulted in injuries or fatalities, drawing national attention and legal scrutiny. In September of 2025, Tesla settled a wrongful death lawsuit stemming from a 2019 California crash where its Autopilot system was active, killing a 15-year-old boy. The lawsuit alleged that Tesla failed to ensure safe system operation and provided insufficient warnings about the risks of relying too heavily on Autopilot.

In Texas, a fatal 2024 crash involving a new Tesla Cybertruck resulted in a wrongful death lawsuit. The claim centers on an alleged defective design, stating the truck’s electric doors locked upon power loss after a crash, trapping the driver inside as the vehicle once again caught fire. The family alleges the crash itself was survivable, but the vehicle design prevented escape, leading to the fatality.

Tesla has also faced high-profile verdicts relating to its technology. In August 2025, a Florida jury ordered Tesla to pay $243 million in damages after a deadly crash involving a Model S with Autopilot engaged. The jury found Tesla partly responsible for the accident, underscoring concerns around the company’s self-driving claims.

Additionally, federal safety regulators opened investigations into defects in Tesla Model Y door handles, which reportedly trapped occupants inside, as well as into Tesla’s delays in reporting crashes involving their driver-assistance systems. These investigations are ongoing and highlight continued concerns over design flaws and safety reporting practices. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) announced an investigation into the company for missing deadlines on crash reports

Tesla Model Y Mechanical Issues

The Tesla car in question in the fatal accident last weekend, the Tesla Model Y, has also been the focus of safety concerns, with ongoing mechanical issues and recalls in 2025 alone. A notable concern is the federal investigation into electronic door handles, which have reportedly failed to open due to low battery voltage, leaving occupants, including children, trapped inside. (While manual releases exist, they are not always accessible or intuitive, and the issue is especially problematic in emergencies.)

There have also been recalls for Model Y SUVs produced this year due to a software defect in the driver’s side window automatic protection system. In these cases, the window may close with excessive force if it fails to detect obstructions, posing a risk of injury. Tesla alleged that they had fixed this issue with a software patch for the most affected vehicles.

Other mechanical problems include brake failures, steering malfunctions, misaligned suspension components, and even loose bolts, particularly in earlier models. Some owners reported issues such as a lack of essential safety features due to computer failures, seat assembly weld defects, disabled emergency braking or stability control, excessively rough ride quality, noisy steering columns, and unreliable power steering. A small number of cars even suffered roof detachment due to manufacturing errors.

Although many issues are fixed through remote updates or service visits, their frequency and safety implications have led federal and global regulators to increase scrutiny of the vehicle’s mechanical and electronic design.

If you have been affected by an accident involving a design flaw in an electric car, call DeShaw Law for a free case evaluation with an experienced Tesla defect lawyer.

Current Tesla Class Action Lawsuits Involving Vehicle Safety

In response to ongoing concerns about the safety of Tesla vehicles, multiple class action law firms have filed suit against the company owned by Elon Musk, on behalf of people injured in the United States. We have outlined the largest suits below.

Securities Fraud and Investor Class Actions

Tesla shareholders have filed lawsuits alleging that the company and its executives made false or misleading statements about the effectiveness and safety of its autonomous driving systems, such as Autopilot and Robotaxi. The suits claim that these misrepresentations inflated Tesla's stock price and led to investor losses when regulatory scrutiny or safety concerns surfaced. These lawsuits cover stock purchases between April 2023 and June 2025.

Consumer Class Actions Over Full Self-Driving (FSD) Marketing

California drivers and purchasers of Tesla’s Full Self-Driving and Autopilot packages are pursuing a certified class action, alleging Tesla overhyped its capabilities and failed to equip cars with the necessary hardware for true autonomous driving. The suit focuses on claims that buyers relied on misleading marketing, which did not reflect the actual performance of the FSD system.

Product Defect and Crash Lawsuits

Tesla has faced and settled class and mass tort lawsuits related to injuries and fatalities from crashes allegedly caused by defects or failures of Autopilot or other vehicle systems. Recent settlements followed fatal crashes in which Tesla's driver-assist systems were reportedly active. These suits argue that Tesla overstated the safety and performance of these features and failed to warn drivers of their limitations adequately.
Additionally, there is a class action lawsuit filed in the Los Angeles Superior Court against Tesla's auto insurance arm, accusing it of deliberately scheming to delay and minimize payouts to policyholders. A  separate class action lawsuit has been certified in California for claims that Tesla misrepresented its "Full Self-Driving" (FSD) technology's autonomous capabilities, potentially impacting thousands of consumers.
 

Have you been involved in a motor vehicle accident involving an electric or self-driving car? Call the Portland Tesla defect lawyers at DeShaw Law for a free consultation: (503) 227 1233.

About the
Author

Aaron DeShaw is a personal injury lawyer at DeShaw Trial Lawyers, a law firm representing injured people with serious injuries including brain injuries and other catastrophic injuries. He has individually, and in association with other law firms, obtained over $1 Billion for his clients. Learn more about Aaron and the Firm.